Irrelevant But Effective Topics For Essay

Irrelevant But Effective Topics For EssayThere are a lot of effective rhetorical topics for essay. These topics are very essential for good essay writing. It is essential to know the subject matter well before writing your essay so that you can make full use of the same in your essay.Knowing the topic well before you start writing your essay will ensure that you write an essay that is innovative and appropriate. While searching for the right topic, make sure that you check out what are the most searched questions and topics about it. Once you get to know the most searched topic, you may also choose the same if you are seeking the same for your essay.There are some topics that you can use when writing an essay. You have to make sure that your topic is not controversial. It is a must to stick to topics that are applicable to the topic. If you think that you cannot do with these topics, then you can always use the same for your essay.The most controversial subjects in writing an essay a re those that deal with the political process. These include things like constitutional amendments, elections, military intervention, etc. These are the topics that should be avoided since it can only be detrimental to your essay. There are other topics that are considered controversial but they are really not necessary for essay writing.The other things that can be controversial are the scientific facts of science. Although there are actually scientific facts about these topics, still it is very helpful to be able to know and comprehend the same in order to write an effective essay. The controversy can also be used for the theological questions that need to be answered.The issues on abortion can also be controversial. When you are trying to address issues like this, you have to make sure that you do not get into these issues if it is really tough for you to do so. It is better to stay away from issues like this so that you can make full use of the topics that you will be writing ab out.Another controversial topic is those of homosexuality itself, particularly if the topic is directed to certain groups. It is best to avoid these topics in essay writing since it can only get you into trouble. It is better to avoid these topics if you are a homosexual.There are a lot of ways that you can successfully use to come up with a good essay. These topics are widely used by most students when they are taking their courses. It is best to be able to familiarize yourself with these topics so that you will be able to use them properly in your essay.

Lion King Film Analysis - 1210 Words

Derek Oxley Movie Review Comp 10-11-17 The Lion King The movie The Lion King is an animated movie of a young lion cub (Simba) who is tricked into leaving his homeland and his throne by his evil Uncle Scar who murdered his father. Simba then runs away and grows up outside the pride lands when all of a sudden he is forced to face his past again. He must decide, is he an outcast, or the rightful ruler and King of the pride lands (IMDB)? This movie is absolutely amazing: a 10/10. It is a great movie for all ages and even for adults. The music does a fantastic job playing with your emotions and giving you a true connection to the characters in the film. The tempos and the beats go along perfectly with the action scenes, making them feel real†¦show more content†¦This perfect because how else does a director show such characteristics in an animated animal movie. The Low angle used in the movie worked wonders. It showed the power of the character and who is in charge now. The High angle is used to show weakness and that’s exactly what it did in the movie and it was perfect. It really gave a strong feel of victory in the end. The eye level angles are the angles mostly used in the movie (90-95%). These angles give you the expressions of the characters. The animators did extraordinary work on these angles. These angles really make the movie (IMDB). The framing and shots of a movie really give us a sense of what is in and what is out. It gives the viewer an idea of the setting, time, and or relationship of characters. There are a few long shots in the movie. These shots are often used in the beginning or end of the movie. In the Lion King these shots really help with letting the viewer know that the movie is over and that Simba won. Close up shots are the most used shots in a movie. These shots show emotion and popular aspects of a character. In The Lion King these shots are great. They do what they are supposed to. The emotion given by these shots is fantastic, and really connects with the audience. The Pan shots are really good given the fact that the movie is animated. These shots occur when the camera is moving from left to right giving a good view of the surrounding area.Show MoreRelatedFilm Analysis Of The Lion King1845 Words   |  8 Pages The film The Lion King was an extraordinary animated film from the Walt Disney Collection. The film uses many theatrical features such as the choice of sound and music, lighting, and the actors and actresses’ voices behind the characters. I will be analyzing this film through formalist theory. â€Å"A formalist approach to analysis is concerned with film form, or how the basic elements are organized to convey certain meanings.† (Goodykoontz Jacobs, 2014) Contextual InformationRead MoreThe Lion King Film Analysis1590 Words   |  7 Pageschildren’s films are completely heterosexual and the majority of children’s films portray male characters of more importance than female characters. Children’s film also portray characters of color to be in a lower class, to be of less importance, and are even portrayed as villains. These social implications influence the ideas that male dominance, heterosexual dominance, and white dominance make up individuals who are of more importance in society. Both the animated movies â€Å"Shark Tale† and â€Å"The Lion King†Read MoreLion King Film Analysis756 Words   |  4 PagesMovie review for The Lion King II, Simbas Pride. The Lion King II, Simbas Pride, is a 1998 animated musical film and the sequel to The Lion King. It is directed by Darrell Rooney and Rob LaDuca. Darrell Rooney has also directed animated films such as Mulan II, Lady and the Tramp II, and Aladdin. Rob LaDuca directed the films Joseph King of Dreams, Winnie the Pooh and Mickys Adventure in Wonderland. Suzanne Pleshette voices Zira as the main antagonist in the film. She is an exiled lionessRead MoreDisneys the Lion King: Sundiata in Disguise?1691 Words   |  7 PagesDisney’s The Lion King: Sundiata in Disguise? Over the course of this semester many of the literary works that have been read contained some source of message designed to both teach and improve either the reader or society. Amongst this collection of enlightening literary works, there have been a particular few that have illustrated this idea as well as highlighted particular historical facts about a specific civilization. One distinct book that has met both of these general objectives isRead MoreThe Lion King s Model Of The Hero s Journey Push An Agenda Towards Adults1139 Words   |  5 Pagesto the Lion King, we have an answer to our research question: â€Å"Does the Lion King’s use of the Hero’s Journey push an agenda towards adults of previous life experiences that are noteworthy, while still maintaining young children as the target audience†? Yes, although it is a children’s movie, it does push an agenda towards adults. We have covered a couple out of several lessons the directors fixed t o the audience. We can now draw three important implications of this analysis. The Lion King campaignsRead MoreThe Lion King, Beauty And The Beast, And Sleeping Beauty1663 Words   |  7 Pagestruths, changes, and adversities of these children books. The Lion King, Beauty and the Beast, and Sleeping Beauty are three of the many children s stories that have controversial backgrounds. No matter the time frame, these stories have their differences, but strangely enough have more than plenty similarities. Mid-1994, Walt Disney Pictures released what could arguably be one of the best animated features of all time, The Lion King. The original story however, was written by one of the most famousRead MoreSimilarities Between Hamlet And The Lion King1535 Words   |  7 PagesHamlet and The Lion King The Shakespeare’s critical analysis William Shakespeare Hamlet is a play that is written about tragedy in the late middle ages. On the other hand, Lion king is a today’s compelling Disney movie that kids and adults both love to watch. In addition, both films partake a lot of similarities since Lion King was inspired by Hamlet. The lion king and the hamlet have the same plots but different outcomes. Hamlet can serve as a metaphor for lion king and the long-termRead MoreBettelheims Theory: Fairy Tales Clarify Realism Essay1327 Words   |  6 Pageswith them give a better direction to his life. (Bettelheim). The popular and adored movie The Lion King illustrates many of the undesirable actions humans take part in. There are a several scenes where the child can especially learn from. This in itself is one reason the movie is the highest grossing hand-drawn film in history, earning over $920 million worldwide as of 2011. My analysis of this film proves it to be an excellent choice for children to discover the complexities of life. If a childRead MoreAn American Classic Children s Movie, The Lion King Essay1674 Words   |  7 PagesAn American classic children’s movie, The Lion King, is a musical film produced by Walt Disney. The original story focuses on a young lion who spirits into a self-imposed exile after believing he was at fault for his father’s death. Although the film targets a younger audience, it contains a substantial amount of symbolism that only adults would understand. In order to examine The Lion King, I will employ â€Å"The Hero’s Journey† established by Joseph Campbell’s book â€Å"The Hero with a Thousand Faces†Read MoreRelationships Between Western And Western Culture1182 Words   |  5 Pagesdepth to the texts’ meanings resulting in a heightened experience and a more significant comprehension of the texts’ ideas. Detecting such intertextual relationships between two wildly different texts; Walt Disney’s 1994 animated musical epic, The Lion King, and Studio Gainax’s 2007 animated mecha television series, Gurren Lagann, has enriched my understanding of the differences between the texts’ representation on the cultural issues of the bildungsroman genre (coming of age story). Despite the inherent

How Compromises Failed to Prevent the Civil War free essay sample

As tensions between the North and the South rose on the issues of slavery and states’ rights, numerous compromises were proposed to ease the conflict. Such compromises included the Missouri Compromise, the Compromise of 1850, and the Crittenden Compromise. These compromises had intentions of defining where slavery was permitted and clarifying states’ rights. They were only temporary fixes to a more pressing issue. Between the Missouri Compromise and the Crittenden Compromise, a series of events changed the political atmosphere of the United States and prevented any more compromises on the institution of slavery from being passed. In the years leading up to the Civil War, numerous laws were passed that not only prevented slavery from expanding to the North, but also limited states’ rights. The Missouri Compromise was one of the first to do so. Senator Henry Clay arranged an imaginary latitude line at 36Â °30’ North and slavery above this line was prohibited, while territories south of this line were permitted to have slaves. This limited the South from further expanding slavery to new territories. Pro-slavery Southerners felt a bias in the political system because Congress now had the power to exclude slavery from U.S. territories. Southern states believed that this power was reserved for them and by proclaiming the 36Â °30’ North latitude line, the federal government exercised unconstitutional power. The Dred Scott decision further supported the clause that the issue of slavery was reserved for the state government. Despite this, the South realized that the North and its anti-slavery views were gaining ground, while the North believed that the Dred Scott ruling limited its power. The Compromise of 1850 shifted the political landscape even more. California sought to be admitted to the Union as a free state, and the Wilmot Proviso suggested that the newly acquired land from the Mexican War was to be free as well. The South was concerned that admission of more free states would offset the balance of representation in Congress. At the same time, the Northerners feared that the revised Fugitive Slave Act was a step towards a slave power conspiracy. Prior to the revision, Northern states such as Missouri and Wisconsin passed personal liberty laws that ultimately nullified the Fugitive Slave Acts of 1793. The U. S. Supreme Court ruling of Prigg v. Pennsylvania weakened the Acts of 1793 even further by asserting that States did not have to aid in the capture of runaway slaves. Eventually the Compromise of 1850 was passed in separate parts and many assumed that it would be the longstanding answer to slavery in the States. In 1854, the Kansas-Nebraska Act tipped the delicate balance of states’ rights in the Compromise of 1850. Senator Henry Clay proposed the notion of popular sovereignty to determine whether these States would be free or slave states. This consequently repealed the Missouri Compromise by allowing slavery to spread North of the Missouri Compromise latitude line if popular sovereignty called for it. Popular sovereignty led to a series of deadly confrontations, known as Bleeding Kansas, between anti-slavery Free-Staters and pro-slavery Border Ruffians. In an attempt to establish Kansas as a free state, anti-slavery organizations such as the New England Emigrant Aid Company convinced thousands of anti-slavery Northerners to settle in the new territory for the sole purpose of casting anti-slavery ballots. The Southerners viewed this as a threat to slavery and established their own counter movement. After the Kansas-Nebraska Act and the events that ensued, the Whig party disintegrated because the sectionalizing effects on slavery could no longer maintain a party comprised of those who were pro-slavery, anti-slavery, and indifferent to slavery. Thus, Bleeding Kansas effectively split the nation into two major political parties: the Republicans in the North and the Democrats in the South. The Republican Party was composed of former Whigs and members of other anti-slavery parties, such as the Liberty Party. Most members of this party were anti-slavery who held a moderate view that failed to classify them as abolitionists. They were opposed to the expansion of slavery and called for Congress to prevent the further expansion of slavery into new territories. They believed that by confining slavery to its current boundaries, it would gradually be eradicated. The formation of the Republican Party was one of the primary reasons of how the political landscape changed in the Union. Throughout this time, the North was growing rapidly due to its industrial economy. They had more railroad mileage, industry, income, population, and ultimately more representation in Congress. In addition, the South was subject to high tariff laws that made it very hard for southern farmers to trade internationally. The result was a strong centralized government in the North, and an agrarian culture in the South that was solely dependent on slavery. Any attack against the institution of slavery in the South could potentially disintegrate the states in the South. In 1859, this fear became a reality as John Brown, an extreme abolitionist, led a raid on at Harpers Ferry. Although this uprising was brought down and denounced by Northern Republicans, slave owners believed that all abolitionists and Northerners shared the same radical views as John Brown. With the emergence of new political parties and the growing support for the Republicans in the North, the campaign of 1860 was the major turning point in the political atmosphere. In May of that year, Abraham Lincoln was nominated at the Republican National Convention as the presidential candidate. The Republican platform had moderate anti-slavery views and endorsed means of promoting industry. The Democratic Party, on the other hand, continued to support their doctrine of popular sovereignty. However, Northern and Southern Democrats interpreted this notion independently. Northern Democrats assumed that under popular sovereignty, slavery would not expand because Free-Staters could quickly settle in the West and thereby claiming the land as free. Southern Democrats assumed the same principle, except instead of free settlers, slaveholders would be able to quickly settle in new territories with their slaves and claim the land as slave territory. This ultimately resulted in the schism of the Democratic Party. At two separate conventions, the Northern Democratic wing nominated Stephen Douglass and supported the doctrine of popular sovereignty, while the Southern wing nominated John Breckinridge and supported the notion that slaveholders were allowed to bring their slaves and claim the land as slave holding. To make the campaign of 1860 more complicated, another political party took its roots, namely the Constitutional Union Party. Composed of conservative members of the Whig and Know Nothing Parties, they nominated John Bell as their presidential candidate. This led to essentially two separate elections: Lincoln versus Douglas in the North, and Breckinridge versus Bell in the South. Perhaps the most controversial issue was the fact that although Lincoln did not appear on the ballot in most Southern states, he was declared the sixteenth President despite not carrying a single southern state. This indicated that the national political system was failing and that the South no longer had an influential role in the government. Despite Lincoln’s assurance that it was not his policy to abolish slavery, Southerners referred back to Harper’s Raid and failed to eed Lincoln’s message. This drastic shift in political atmosphere following the Compromise of 1850 and the 1860 Presidential election resulted in the inability to accept any compromises. The South believed they no longer had a voice in the government and believed that this would inevitably lead to the abolishment of slavery by the Northern majority in Congress. The South was dependent on slavery for income, so they could not afford to switch to a system of free labor. The Crittenden Compromise is a prime example of how a Northern, anti-slavery view rejected any compromises made by the South. Evidently, this led to the secession of Southern states. Northerners and Southerners were able to accept compromises made regarding slavery prior to the Presidential election of 1860. However, as the Northerner’s fear of a slave power rose so did the Southerner’s fear of a centralized government that would abolish slavery. Events like Bleeding Kansas and Harper’s Raid increased tensions between slaveholders and non-slaveholders. In the end, they realized that slavery could no longer remain issue that could be compromised on. In 1845, the Republic of Texas was annexed and admitted to the Union as the 28th state. Following the Mexican War, the issue of slavery in the newly acquired land caused fierce debates among politicians. Southern Democrats were heavily influenced by Manifest Destiny, and hoped acquire new slave-owning territory, while those in the North feared the rise of a Slave Power. The House of Representatives passed the Wilmot Proviso, which stated that slavery was prohibited in any territory acquired from Mexico. However, the Senate failed to pass the proviso due to an overwhelming pro-slavery opinion. wever, Senator Stephen A. Douglas passed the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 and consequently repealed the Missouri Compromise by allowing slavery north of the latitude line. The notion of popular sovereignty led to a series of deadly confrontations, known as Bleeding Kansas, between anti-slavery Free-Staters and pro-slavery Border Ruffians. In an attempt to establish Kansas as a free state, anti-slavery organizations such as the New England Emigrant Aid Company convinced thousands of anti-slavery Northerners to settle in the new territory for the sole purpose of casting anti-slavery ballots. The Southerners viewed this as a threat to slavery and established their own counter movement. Initially, the Border Ruffians won the election and drafted a pro-slavery constitution for the territory of Kansas. In response, Free-Staters drafted the Topeka constitution and formed a shadow government. In 1857, another constitutional convention met and drafted the Lecompton Constitution, which was heavily opposed by abolitionists. This eventually gave way to the Wyandotte Constitution, which was ultimately approved by the Senate and admitted Kansas as a free state. The unfailing anti-slavery voice in Kansas Election of Lincoln (republican, northerner, antislave person) = south would lose more power in congress Less population in south = less representation Shifting political landscape any territory above this line was prohibited to have slavery. Territories south of this line were permitted to have slaves. This was evident when a compromise was made in 1860.